The Politically “Correct” Church

It seems every time you walk into a Christian bookstore or even watch a Christian TV station you’ll probably run across an energetic, and articulate woman preaching the Word of God or promoting her book.  Women like Juanita Bynum, Paula White, and Joyce Meyers are just a few of the popular women pastors who have crept into the church to stake their claim on the title of pastor or preacher in congregations all across this nation.  But we do need to ask ourselves, “Is this biblical?” and use the Word of God as our final authority and not be swayed by our emotions or the feminist movement.  Which by the way is not biblical as well.  What does the bible say on this matter?  Well there are no scriptures that tell us that women can be pastors or elders, but we do have scriptures that tell us the very opposite.

Let a woman learn quietly with all submissiveness. I do… not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet. -1 Timothy 2:11-12

The Biblically Correct Church

Priscilla and Aquila brought Apollos into their home and they both discipled him, explaining the Word of God to him more accurately (Acts 18:26).That is biblical for discipleship but not for being a woman elder in the church.  In Romans 16:1, even if Phoebe is considered a “deaconess” instead of a “servant,” that does not indicate that Phoebe was a teacher in the church. “Able to teach” is given as a qualification for elders, but not deacons (1 Timothy 3:1-13; Titus 1:6-9). Elders/bishops/deacons are described as the “husband of one wife,” “a man whose children believe,” and “men worthy of respect.” Clearly the indication is that these qualifications refer to men. In addition, in 1 Timothy 3:1-13 and Titus 1:6-9, masculine pronouns are used exclusively to refer to elders/bishops/deacons.  If men are to be the heads of their homes as said in Ephesians 5:23 why would he make her head of the church? God is a God of order and in Him there is no confusion.

But all things should be done decently and in order.  -1 Corinthians 14:40

Biblical Womanhood

Now of course scripture is very clear that older women should teach and train the younger women (Titus 2:3-4) who in turn should teach their own children at home.  Timothy was raised by his mother and grandmother who taught him the scriptures from very early in his life. And that’s not to say in a church setting a woman can’t disciple, answer questions or encourage a brother in Christ (who her husband knows or having her husband’s permission). Those things in parenthesis are my own personal convictions.  But this idea that men aren’t stepping up to the plate to preach so women have to take on those roles is ridiculous.  God is sovereign over all things and the bible does warn us that not all should be quick to teach because of the greater judgment.  In many weak and shallow churches in America all you need is charisma and the willingness to step up to the pulpit to preach the word of God whether you are male or female.  But to be a pastor, preacher or teacher is a gift, a calling that must be tested and proven so that those who should not be teaching can be weeded out.  Women are to be keepers of their homes and their primary ministry is their children.  That is not a lesser calling or something to be shunned at, but a blessing that the Lord has given to us.  Just because we see many popular and successful women pastors in the world doesn’t mean it is right. It is only success based on the values of this fleeting world and not according to scripture. We want to be biblical, not popular.

For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, -2 Timothy 4:3

I. Introduction

Slowly but surely, in this day and age we are losing touch with the importance of true theology and true doctrine. Everyday the church moves closer and closer to a negative outlook on the Christian knowing God. Those who put an emphasis on the  importance of right doctrine and right theology are seen as divisive, big headed, academic, argumentative, etc. The church seems to be completely comfortable with saying humility and love is being tolerant of many different ideas and perspectives of scripture.

When Jesus was asked what was the greatest commandment he replied:

“And you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.” -Mark 12:30

The Post-Modern church replies:

“And you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and check your  mind at the door”

II. What is Post-Modernism

When we talk about post-modernism we are talking about how our society has come to understand and explain truth. Society as a whole has gone through many stages of understanding truth. We went through an era where what we understood of truth relied on explaining things with the supernatural, the Egyptians had a god for just about everything just as did the Greeks, and the Romans and a number of other societies. In the turn of 19th century there was an emergence of something called The Enlightenment, where things were explained with science and philosophy. Scientist, sociologist, psychologist, etc. said that this movement would end religion because they now knew that there was an exact explanation for everything. Come to find out, to explain everything is to explain away explanation itself.

This brings us to the current movement, post-modernism, or there is no absolute truth, it’s all true. Shirley MacLaine is a guru in this new age movement and she explains post-modernism well when she says, “It’s true if you believe it and that goes for anything.”

III. God Disagrees With Post-Modernism

Because we have the Word, we know that God does not agree with the post-modern movement and that Scripture is absolute truth.

1. What We Do Not Know About God

“My thoughts are not your thoughts nor my ways your ways.” -Isaiah 55

“Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways! -Romans 11:33

God has not revealed everything to us. We do not know God quantitatively and exhaustively. He tells us through Moses that if we did understand him in this way that it would KILL US! This is in regards to his externalities and his glory. We also do not understand him and see him the way that he sees himself. This is in regards to how he exists in three persons all at the same time in the trinity. This and among an infinite number of other things God is incomprehensible for sure.

2. What We Do Know About God

Romans 1 says that God has made himself clearly known. He has done this through the general revelation of creation and that he has also done this through the special revelation of his scripture. Because of this, we know that God is sovereign. We know that all things are created by him, through him and for him. Everything that is in the bible is God revealing truths about himself to us so this list is obviously not exhaustive for the sake of time and the fact that we can open the bible and answer this question.

IV. How the Post-Modern Church Has Perverted God’s Incomprehensibility

The post-modern church is not wrong in saying that there are things about God that we cannot be certain on, what they are wrong about is allowing that statement to persuade them to say there is no absolute truth about God.

1. Taking It To The Extreme

We all know that naturally in our flesh we are inclined to take things to the extreme. I truly believe that post-modernism in the church is simply that, an extremism of truth that there are things about God that are incomprehensible and a direct response to the extremism of knowing God. On one side you have a church that says there is no absolute truth. They say that because learning, studying, and knowing doctrine can create pride that it’s an act of humility to not involve themselves with these things.

2. A Shroud Called Humility

This abandonment of theology and doctrine and masking it with humility is defined by John MacArthur as “The Hermeneutics of Humility”. And this “humility” sounds like this:

“Well, I am much too humble to say that my interpretation of scripture is right, and I am way to humble to say that your interpretation of the scripture is wrong.”

Do you see how damaging this can be to a church? With this perspective, no one holds another accountable. Iron does not sharpen iron. Whatever the preacher says is truth to him so “let’s not call him out” even if it does not agree with scripture, because “we don’t want to be prideful”. It makes me sick to my stomach to even admit that this is actually happening in our churches right now as I type this.

The truth of this perspective is that these churches are covering up their unrighteousness; laziness and pride, with a word associated with righteousness; humility. They are lazy because instead of battling their prideful, divisive flesh with unceasing  prayer that God might reveal himself to them in humility, they abandon a pursuit to know him altogether, it’s a cop out. It’s hard to know God and pursue humility at the same time, but that does not give us an excuse to abandon knowing the doctrines.

V. How God Intends For Us To Handle His Revelation

The truth is there is a right interpretation of scripture and a wrong interpretation of scripture

1. God Intends For Us to Take Ownership Of What He Has Revealed

I believe that Deuteronomy 29:29 defines how we are to understand the incomprehensibility and the comprehensibility of God all at once.

“The secret things belong to the Lord our God, But the things that are revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may do all the words of this law.” -Deuteronomy 29:29

This beautiful piece of scripture tells us that there are secrets of God, there is a mystery, and they belong to Him. It also tells us though, that what he has revealed to us is given to us, that it is ours, we have ownership of his revelation. Isn’t that amazing? Praise God for the knowledge of Him that he has entrusted to us, that he says we have ownership of!

2. God Intends For Us to Proclaim Him Unapologetically

In Romans, Paul provides preaches truths about God without regard to the worldly consequence. Paul understands that God is absolutely knowable, but that what we know is minute compared to all that there is to know about Him. He glorifies God for the revelation that He provides and marvels at what is not revealed. Paul spends an immense amount of time in Romans 1-10 proclaiming some hard to swallow truths about our God. These things are still, to this day, hard to swallow. He challenges the world view with verses like:

“For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek” -Romans 1:16

“For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus.” Romans 3:23

“For while we were still weak, at the right time Christ died for the ungodly. -Romans 5:6

“For sin will have no dominion over you, since you are not under law but under grace.” -Romans 6:14

“For he says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.” So then it depends not on human will or exertion but on God, who has mercy.” -Romans 9:15-16

WOW! That’s truth being preached unapologetically.

3. God Intends For Us to Have a Reverence for What We Do Not Understand

Paul does not just close the book here though, he does not say “OK that is all there is to know about God, thank you for your attention”. No, we reach Romans 11 and Paul says this:

“Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways! For who has known the mind of the Lord, or who has been his counselor? Or who has given a gift to him that he might be repaid?” -Romans 11:33-35

Paul reaches the end of himself and simply worships God for the truth of his incomprehensibility. Do you see that this is how we should be. We don’t close the book because he is incomprehensible but we also do not close the book because we think we know it all.

4. God Intends Us to Know Him with Humility

If humility is problem, saying there is no absolute truth is not the answer. We get into the Word and we learn about our God. We understand what Christ has done for us. If pride rears its ugly head in all of this, we fall prostrate in front of the throne of grace and plead with God in prayer that He would humble us. We do this because we know that every bit of knowledge that we do have has been granted to us graciously by God. Our knowledge is limited because it is subject to God’s control. He is sovereign over all things and we are not. We have nothing to be prideful in or to boast about. Do not abandon doctrine, instead battle your prideful flesh with prayer. So, we are not talking about the kind of knowledge that puffs up, or is divisive, or hardheaded, but a knowledge that is loving.

“If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or [whether] I speak of myself.” -John 7:17

VI. Conclusion

So God is knowable. Scripture tells us a vast amount of things about him. There’s no slight agnosticism in the Bible. He did not create us and go hide out somewhere waiting for us to discover Him. He has given us creation. He has given us the Bible. So we need not apologize for daring to say things about, if God has revealed it, then we can say it and say it with certainty and assurance. Whatever he hasn’t revealed we do not know, and what we do know he has graciously revealed to us.

Tom Ascol of Founders Ministries received a memo. It’s a little hard to believe, but, it is real.

It’s a ‘memo’ designed to reveal Calvinists pastors in your midst. Wouldn’t that be a tragedy? All joking aside, this really is sad. Those proclaiming to be promoting the Gospel are looking to ‘snuff’ those who actually are!

Some of the signs to look for include:

Focused on creating the ‘true’ church.
Use of the ESV Bible
Using as a statement of belief confessions like the 1689 London Baptist Confession
A move toward elder rule
A member of the Founders movement and attends meetings

“Yesterday I was sent the following 3 documents that have been circulating in Western Tennessee among some Southern Baptist Churches. It seems that they were distributed at seminars being held for churches to teach “how to find out if any of your staff are Calvinists and how to get rid of them.” Since receiving them I have communicated with others who have verified that they are being made available to Southern Baptist churches in Tennessee, not by any official denominational worker, but by zealous people who view the doctrines of grace as heresy. I am trying to contact one or more of those persons in hopes of better understanding what has provoked this mission.

The first document is in the form of a memo and is entitled, “Reformed Red Flags.” It contains a list of 16 “behaviors” to look for when seeking to smoke out Calvinistic pastors. Number 3 on the list is “use of the ESV Study Bible.” Someone should alert Crossway immediately. Founders made the list, as did John Piper, Jonathan Edwards, RC Sproul, James White and the first Southern Baptist confession of faith (which is still used at Southern and Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminaries, and which even the famous non-Calvinist Paige Patterson has signed), the Abstract of Principles.”

Source: The above is sourced from 5ptsalt.com

I was a baby Christian at that time, all I knew was that I had broken God’s commandments every day and that I needed to repent and believe in Jesus Christ to be saved.  I had a great love and appreciation for the Savior because of what He had done for me.  I had a desire to serve Him in any way that I could and tell others about Him.  I was hungry for His Word!

Week after week the pastor would teach the Word and have altar calls at the end of the service.  Back then, I would say that he would more often than not preach on sin, hell, righteousness, judgement, etc…  Every once in a while I would hear something a little different coming from the pulpit…  “if you’ve come to the end of yourself… your marriage is on the rocks, you’re on the brink of divorce, you take drugs, you’re an alcoholic and you need to break out of the addiction, you’re sick and tired of being sick and tired…  then just come to Jesus, and He’ll make it all better.” At that time I didn’t think too much of it, I even believed it to be biblical… and so I went with the flow of things.

Over the next couple of years I actually began to hear more and more of the message I just described and less and less of the biblical Gospel.  I now know that God was definitely speaking to me and opening my eyes to see what was going on during that time.  As this was happening week after week, (I heard gradually less about sin, hell judgment, Law) and as I was studying the scriptures on my own God began to show me that there was something wrong with what I was hearing.  I couldn’t really pinpoint what it was right away, but I just knew that something was off.  It just sounded a little too squishy to me…  as Todd Friel would say.  I continued to press on as a worship leader in various ministries even though I knew that something was wrong with what was coming from the pulpit.

It wasn’t until about 3 1/2 years ago, probably about March of 2006 when I started listening to then Way of the Master Radio hosted by Todd Friel.  (Now Wretched Radio)  One day, he was talking about the Reformers and Reformed Theology.  This was something that I had never heard before… I mean, I had heard of Calvinism but I didn’t know that it was also called Reformed Theology.  It struck interest in me so I endeavored to find out what it was.  And I endeavored… and researched… and studied the scriptures… and endeavored some more.  After wrestling with it for about 6 months, I was a Calvinist!

This led to more and more studying… going deeper into the scriptures, going to the greek and hebrew and studying the Word exegetically, using  proper hermeneutics.   I have studied ecclesiology, eschatology, dispensationalism, covenant theology, missiology… and I’m still going praise God!  Prior to learning about reformed theology I didn’t even know these words existed in the dictionary!  I didn’t know church history, I didn’t know anything about Martin Luther, or any of the reformers. (except C.H. Spurgeon, cause every good Calvaryite throws in a little Spurgeon every now and then!)

Since then, my eyes were fully opened to the pragmatic ways of Calvary Chapel. (”If we get them to get up and walk down the aisle during an altar call and repeat the sinners prayer after us, then they are saved.  Look at how many raised their hands tonight!  How many decisions were there?  Praise God they made a decision to follow Christ!” – paraphrased)   I want to say one thing: This does not pertain to every Calvary Chapel, I know full well that there are a few out there that are swimming against the flow!  They’re not all like this. But let me say this:  Just because someone raises their hand, or stands up, or walks the aisle and repeats a prayer after you doesn’t mean they are saved at all!  Especially if they heard the “weighed and found wanting”,  “squishy” interpretation of the Gospel that we hear so prevalent in the American church today.  You know what I’m talking about too… “God has a wonderful plan for you life…” or “Just give Jesus a chance and He’ll make everything better…”  or “Accept Him into your heart…” or “There’s a God-shaped hole in your heart that can only be filled by Jesus…” or “you’ve tried everything else and you find that there is nothing that can fulfill you so give Jesus a go, He will fulfill you…”

None of these are biblical. Go ahead, try and give me one text (in context, no proof-texting allowed) that resembles any of the examples I just gave…  You’re not going to find one if you’re being honest, rational and exegetical in your approach to scripture.

Check this out.  Dr. James White, founder of Alpha and Omega Ministries, just posted a blog featuring a youtube video with Chuck Smith and other Calvary Chapel leadership taking a call during the radio program “Pastors Perspective” the other day and I wanted to include it here to show you just how shallow their approach to interpreting the text can be.  So I’m going to embed the video and then include the audio of James White discussing what he heard.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKXYeUqH8QE

Now, here’s James White’s podcast “Dividing Line” where he also plays the video and then shares his thoughts on what he heard. (What you want to hear is about 12 minutes into the podcast)
James White’s original post can be found here.

My friend Michael Brewer who blogs over at Diary of a Broken Vessel wrote a post about his experiences at Calvary Chapel a couple of weeks ago that I thought pretty much hit the nail on the head as to some of the problems we find within the Calvary Chapel movement or brand as he calls it.  I wanted to add his thoughts here within this post since I agree with most if not all that he had to say…

Original post here. Or just read below…

I have a tendency to be very critical and sharp when it comes to discussing Chuck Smith, the Calvary Chapel “brand“, the church of my youth, and those leading (or involved with) them.

Chuck Smith’s system,beliefs, theology, or whatever you want to call it is questionable at best. The Word is mishandled and conformed into his image and heavily backed by verses that support only the Calvary Chapel position.Controversial subjects that can be quite uncomfortable are handled in a way to find themiddle road so that everyone is kept happy and peaceful -though ignorant- so as not to lose numbers (Calvary Chapel Distinctives, pp.56-57).

Some people object because they feel that I gloss over certain passages of Scripture, and they’re correct. But glossing over controversial issues is often deliberate because there are usually two sides. And I have found that it’s important not to be divisive and not to allow people to become polarized on issues, because the moment they are polarized, there’s division.

~Calvary Chapel Distinctives, Chuck Smith, pp. 55

Chuck Smith also holds to an authoritarian form of church government known as the Moses Model.

Let’s look at an example of theocracy in which God was ruling. Under God there was a man called Moses. Moses went to God for guidance and direction. Moses was the earthly leader who was recognized as receiving from God the guidance, direction, laws, and rules for the nation. It was recognized by the people that he was their link to God…

…In the church today we see this structure in a modified form. We see that Jesus Christ is the Head over the body of the church. It’s His church. He’s the One in charge. As pastors, we need to be like Moses, in touch with Jesus and receiving His direction and guidance. As pastors we need to be leading the church in such a way that the people know that the Lord is in control…Also like Moses, within the church we have a Board of Elders who are there to pray with us and support us in seeking the Lord’s leading for the church.

Let me warn you. First of all, you want to get elders who are men of prayer, and who recognize that God has anointed you and ordained you as the pastor of the church…

…It’s necessary to have godly men who recognize that God has called and ordained you as the pastor of the church. Men who will work with you and support those things that God is directing you, as the pastor, to implement within the church…

~Calvary Chapel Distinctives, Chuck Smith, pp. 21-23

In short, the pastor is a type of Moses, he has the greatest access to God, hears God the clearest, and surrounds himself with those who approve of him and support his moves (cult of personality). This has lead to all sorts of abuse within many Calvary Chapel churches (not limited to the senior pastor alone!).

Critics say this “Moses model” produces pastors who refuse to let their authority be challenged. Such pastors often resist accountability measures such as financial audits and providing detailed financial statements. Some curious Calvary Chapel attendees, who have sought financial information from their churches, say they were ostracized.

Other churchgoers say Calvary Chapel pastors also don’t like to be questioned. During the investigation for this article, Smith cautioned CT’s reporter: “The Lord warns, ‘Don’t touch my anointed. Do my prophet no harm.’ I think that you are trying to do harm to the work of God. I surely wouldn’t want to be in your shoes.”

-Day of Reckoning, Rob Moll, Christianity Today

Chuck Smith’s “Distinctives” are to be accepted by all affiliate churches via their “fellowshipping” process according to the Calvary Chapel Outreach Fellowship website.

Can I become a Calvary Chapel if I don’t necessarily agree with the Calvary Distinctives and have Biblical proof for my position?

No, because we want the use of the name Calvary Chapel (copyrighted) to imply the doctrinal positions expressed in the “Distinctives”. This is not to say other positions are wrong, they are simply other positions than those held by Calvary Chapel. It is no different in the secular world and referred to as “branding”. When a name comes into widespread recognition that describes what one can expect, it needs to be maintained as such.

~CCOF FAQ

So it really comes as no surprise that there are so many people who have experienced similar abuses (and treatment when that abuse is challenged or brought to light) across the board. I have talked to many current and former Calvary Chapel goers who have shared similar stories of abuse of authority, ostracism when they questioned prominent members/leaders within their Calvary Chapel, and how they are called out as being unfaithful to forgive when they have sought to have their problems addressed (the victim being told that they are at fault).

Personal Stories

The church of my youth also followed closely in the way of Chuck Smith, which as discussed above, makes perfect sense. I experienced certain abuses, and when I brought them to light I was turned away to deal with it myself, or was told to just forgive. And I completely agree that we should forgive those who have wronged us, but when the wrongs are being committed habitually and blatantly, you have done as Scripture demands, and you are still brushed off, there then comes a point when the church needs to step up.

We didn’t do that. In not just my case alone, in several instances I witnessed practiced sin ignored for the sake of maintaining peace among the saints. This turned those of us who made claims of wrong doing into dividers and enemies of peace. Without accountability or real church membership, the matter was simple: if you don’t like it, there’s the door.

Now I have written about some of the wrongs I’ve seen and experienced before. I used to own a blog titled The Mess You Left Behind where I -in a rather sinful manner (and for which I later repented)- spewed forth vile rhetoric in response to the wrongs committed against me. And I have since forgiven those who have wronged me, but still I am critical.

Calvary Critical

I am critical of Chuck Smith because he does what is right in his own eyes. He holds his own views superior even though their may be Biblical support against them. The Moses Model (really?). Heencourages scoffing at ideas contrary to his own (and also demonstrates a lack of knowledge of what happened at the cross, and proper exegesis of Scripture -see link-).

I am critical of the Calvary Chapel Brand because of the abuse I have experienced, witnessed, heard, and read about. I am critical because of the treatment of God’s Word. How God’s Word is made into a play thing that we manipulate to fit our own reasoning and conscience. How peace and love are to be sought after in all things, at all cost.

And I am critical of the church of my youth for a number of reason similar to the things discussed above. But chiefest of all things I have regarding them is this: a family was utterly destroyed before them. They were warned before, they were talked to during, and they were asked begged to help after, but in silence they stood for the sake of peace, ignoring sin, and that family is utterly undone. And I have not spoken to my father since then.

Because of all of this, I will always be critical of Chuck Smith, the Calvary Chapel Brand, and the church of my youth. But…

All Things Are Not Equal

But please understand that NOT ALL CALVARY CHAPELS ARE THE SAME! There are some that break what seems to be the general mold. There are those Calvary Chapels that submit first to the Word of God, understand what the Church is supposed to look like, practice what they preach, practice church discipline, and seek the Will of God first and foremost.

So…

So if it ever seems that I am being critical of Chuck ‘n’ Pals or of the Calvary Chapel Brand or even the church of my youth this is my official reason as to why you can expect these things from me. I pray that they are not the overarching theme of my life or my writings. And I write this for anyone who has ever been hurt like I have, or for those who have ever wondered why I am so critical of the things I have spoken of here today.

– Michael Brewer

And here’s a brother who is a Bible College director within the movement who has questions…

Me again.  Now, like I said before there are Calvary Chapels out there that are in opposition to what Pastor Chuck has laid out in the distinctives.  As he continues to grow older there is no doubt in my mind that there will be many more that will “come out” so to speak.  Here is an good example of a church that has different views. (albeit biblical)

My earnest prayer to God is that He will bring about change within the CC movement.  That He will raise up pastors and elders that will be biblically honest, properly exegeting the scriptures and not suppressing the truth of His Word in order to keep people in the pews.  God’s Word is divisive by nature… and if you’re interpreting it and preaching it rightly that’s exactly what it will do.  But at the end of the day, you will know that you have true Christians there who care about being true to the text of scripture whether it is palatable or not.

As for me and my family, we will be moving on.

– Feel free to leave comments, they are welcome.  Even if you’re feeling a bit snarky…

]]> http://regenerated.us/is-calvary-chapel-theologically-sound/feed/ 3